“Oh, the network slogan is true, ‘Watch FOX and be damned for all eternity’.” – Ned Flanders

The Simpsons openly rebelled against the staid world of television and remorselessly mocked American society. Even in the 1980s, neither of those were novel concepts. But unlike counter-culture publications,9 risque niche programming, and art house movies that trafficked in the same sentiment, The Simpsons was beamed directly into the vast majority of American homes. Marge and Homer were just as available in Kansas as they were in New York.

That is a distinction that has become less important in the days of satellite television, DVDs, broadband internet, and smart phones, but it was vital at the time. The influence the three television networks exerted over American culture is hard to comprehend today. Americans see only a handful of movies per year and read even fewer books. But that same mythically average American watches hours of television every day. For the overwhelming majority of people, the chattering cyclops was their cultural keystone, and it was dominated by just three organizations.

By the 1980s, ABC, CBS, and NBC had been synonymous with television for so long that they seemed like something out of the Old Testament.10 In 1986, FOX conducted research to determine what kind of programming people would want from a hypothetical fourth network. They unearthed an enormous amount of frustration:xiii

“What we found was a tremendous vacuum essentially – every viewer had a problem with every network. They would say things like, ‘They canceled my favorite show,’ or ‘Their shows are all the same,’ or ‘They only do one show that’s a hit and then everybody copies that.’ There was a very strong theme of very repetitive complaints about the three networks”

FOX aimed to fill that vacuum, and by the time The Simpsons premiered in 1989 it had achieved modest success with shows like 21 Jump Street and Married . . . with Children, programs that had no counterparts on the established networks. But it was still just a proto-network, a few errant stations, some UHF affiliates, and the long shattered remains of the DuMont Television Network, which had gone dark in 1956. It only programmed a couple of hours per night, had no news division, and wasn’t even on seven days a week until 1993.

Whatever FOX lacked in respect and prestige, however, it made up for in sheer reach. Starting in 1987, a decade before small dish satellite services went mainstream and two decades before home video streaming became practical, FOX was the only thing that could be seen by even a significant fraction of the audience for ABC, CBS and NBC. It didn’t have the total coast-to-coast coverage they did, but it was head and shoulders above everything else.

Nor did FOX lack for marketing panache. Like most News Corp subsidiaries before and since, the network was a tireless self promoter, and to solidify its outsider cool, FOX more or less openly flew the Jolly Roger in its early years.11 It billed itself as the new kid, edgy, unrepentant, and modern. It featured a lot of minority programming, was looser with lower key swear words, and had a more casual attitude towards attractive people in skimpy clothing. FOX may have been owned by a billionaire plutocrat and run by a bunch of multi-millionaire television veterans, but compared to the ancient power of the established networks, it could credibly present itself as anti-establishment.

FOX has since become synonymous with the American right thanks to FOX News and 24, but in the late 1980s it looked like a lefty plot to a lot of people. A year into its run, Married . . . with Children had been the subject of a public boycott when a Michigan woman took offense to an episode. (Which was the basis for the previously discussed Season 2 episode, “Itchy & Scratchy & Marge”.) Arsenio Hall got his start on FOX, which didn’t help the network’s reputation among the doyennes of television when he began threatening Johnny Carson’s longstanding and universally lauded run of late night dominance. Thanks to those kinds of disruptions, and the fact that it relentlessly described itself as such, FOX was cool, controversial and growing.

The Simpsons and FOX both launched at the perfect moment. Network television’s power as a cultural arbiter was at its peak, technology hadn’t yet begun diluting its audience with competitors, and the existing players were all stodgy and old fashioned. A few years earlier and FOX might not have been big enough to make the show truly catch, a few years later and Springfield might have been just another part of the fourth network. But on FOX in the 1989-90 season, The Simpsons was in a unique position in terms of availability, cultural cache, and controversy. It wasn’t for nothing that FOX advertised the premier by saying, “They’re coming to save the 90s!”.xiv

It was the right show, on the right network, at the right time. With hundreds of channels, instant video, and the ever expanding internet, there will likely never be another confluence like that.

Continue to Chapter 5: The Retirements.

Notes and Sources

9. Matt Groening’s “Life in Hell” cartoons got their start in alternative weeklies.

10. ABC was the youngest of the three, and even it had been a full fledged network for two decades at that point.

11. In the United Kingdom, the Sky One channel was getting started at the same time. Like FOX, Sky One was a News Corporation property and it used The Simpsons to establish itself as a major part of the media landscape. For details, see: http://deadhomersociety.com/2012/06/13/english-who-needs-that-the-simpsons-in-the-united-kingdom/.

xiii. Kimmel, Daniel M. The Fourth Network: How FOX Broke the Rules and Reinvented Television. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee, 2004 p22

xiv. http://deadhomersociety.com/2009/12/17/simpsons-roasting-on-an-open-fire-promos/


5 Responses to “4 – You’re Watching FOX, Shame on You”


  1. 1 Residents Fan
    19 May 2012 at 7:36 pm

    Very, very interesting points.

    Something that may be worth noting is that the “Simpsons” was also purchased
    by the British channel Sky One, which was available in two countries
    (the UK and the Republic of Ireland). Like FOX, Sky One,” was a tireless self promoter, and,.. it billed itself as the new kid, edgy, unrepentant, and modern.” Sky One’s airing of “The Simpsons” drew
    large numbers of viewers to the network (previously Sky One was best known for airing old US shows
    like “Lost in Space” and “Gidget”, which hardly fitted its rebellious self-image). Many
    TV historians credit “The Simpsons” with making Sky One a commerical
    success.

    At one point in the mid-90s, Sky One was airing at least six episodes of the show
    per day.

    • 2 tinaun
      20 May 2012 at 4:54 pm

      man, 6 episodes a day, all classic seasons. that sounds like heaven.

      Also, the residents are awesome!

      • 3 Russ
        30 July 2012 at 4:38 am

        yeah, in one day they were airing the entire length of any of their own shows worth of Simpsons episodes; how d’ya like them apples?

        • 4 Guillermo
          13 July 2014 at 2:40 pm

          Here in Argentina, on a public TV channel, for years and even today, on weekends there’s 4 hours on a row of Simpsons episodes. Mostly, and thankfully, are old episodes, but sometimes they throw in newer ones.

  2. 10 June 2014 at 12:15 pm

    Hey! Would you mind if I share your blog with
    my myspace group? There’s a lott of folks that I think would really appreciate your content.
    Please let me know. Thank you


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




E-Mail

deadhomersociety (at) gmail

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Twitter Updates

Useful Legal Tidbit

Even though it’s obvious to anyone with a functional frontal lobe and a shred of morality, we feel the need to include this disclaimer. This website (which openly advocates for the cancellation of a beloved television series) is in no way, shape or form affiliated with the FOX Network, the News Corporation, subsidiaries thereof, or any of Rupert Murdoch’s wives or children. “The Simpsons” is (unfortunately) the intellectual property of FOX. We and our crack team of one (1) lawyer believe that everything on this site falls under the definition of Fair Use and is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. No revenue is generated from this endeavor; we’re here because we love “The Simpsons”. And besides, you can’t like, own a potato, man, it’s one of Mother Earth’s creatures.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 412 other followers